THE SOCIAL CONFLICT EXPERIENCED BY THE MAINCHARACTER IN NOVEL CHARLES’ DICKENS’ NOVEL“GREAT EXPECTATIONS

Ambar Wati; Sahril; La Sunra

Ambar Wati universitas negeri makassar
Sahril Universitas Negeri Makassar
La Sunra Universitas Negeri Makassar

Keywords: Language Style, Joos, Movie, Red Shoes and the Seven Dwarfs.

Abstract

There are various styles of language used when communicating. Based on Joos'theory (1976), he categorizes the style of language into 5 categories namely frozen style, formal style, consultative style, casual style, and intimate style. This study aims to identify the types of language styles found in Red Shoes and the Seven Dwarfs Movie and the factors that influence the use of language style in films. The method used in this research is qualitative research. Downloading movies and movie scripts, watching them multiple times, and taking notes are some of the strategies used to collect data. In the data, the researcher identified four categories of language styles: formal, consultative, casual, and intimate. For frozen style, not found in data. In the data, the researcher determined that casual language style was more prominent. Then, a number of factors, such as participant, setting, topic, and function, affect the language style used in the data.

References

Abrams, M. H. (1981). A Glossary of Literary Terms. New York: Holt, Rinehartet Winston, inc.
Arifuddin, (2014). An Analysis of Social Conflict in Rick Riordan’s Novel “The RedPyramid” Arikunto, S. (1992). Prosedur Penelitian; Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta:Rineka
Cipta.
Bartholomew, J. (1989). Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary oftheEnglish Language. New York: Portland House. Inc.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Chris, McDonald, et all, (2002). Charitable Conflicts of Interest. Journal of BusinessEthics
Cole, S., & Lindeman, J. (1990). Reading and Responding to Literature. New York:HarcourtBracejovanovich. Inc.
Creswell, J. (2009). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed. New York: Sage Publications.
Damono, Sapardi Djoko. (1978). Sociology of Literature: A Brief Introduction. Jakarta: Library of Language Development andDevelopment: Ministry of Education and Culture.
Endaswara, S. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Sastra. Yogyakarta: Center For Academic Publishing Service.
Fananie, Zainuddin. (2002). Literature Review. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press. Harrington, Austin.2005.Modern Social Theory An Introduction. OxfordUniversityPress.
Kristina, Lindemann, (2007). The Impact of Objective Characteristics onSubjective Social Position. Trames.
Nurgiyantoro, Burhan. (2002). Theory of the Study of Fiction.
Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press Semi, M Atar. 1988. Literary Anatomy. Padang: Sidharma
Setiadi, Elly and Kolip, Usman. (2013). Introduction to Political Sociology. Jakarta:Kencana Sinar, T. S. (2002). An Introduction to A Systemic Functional Lingustic- OrientetDiscourse Analysis. Singapore: Deezed ConsultSingapore
Suminto A. Sayuti. (2002). Introduction to Prose. Yogyakarta: Gama Media
Sugiyono. (2014). Educational Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative,and R&D Approaches. Bandung: Alphabe
Soekanto, Soerjono. (2006). Sociology An Introduction. Jakarta: UI Press.
Syahputra,Iswandi.(2006). Peace Journalism. Yogyakarta: Media Pillar
Wellek, Rene and Austin, Warren.(1989). Literary Theory. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Wellek,
Wiyatmi. (2008). Introduction to Literary Studies. Yogyakarta: StudentLibrary.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.